EARL (Evaluation And Report Language) 0.95 RDF Schema
$Id: 0.95.rdf,v 1.1 2001/05/26 23:24:13 spalmer Exp $
These could be free standing units - used outside of
earl:Evaluation(s) if required
The entity making the assertion (e.g. running the test). This
could be anonymous if for example you want to declare other
context information.
EARL (Evaluation And Report Language)
0.95
An Evaluation is the most basic unit of EARL as it stands
The general platform on which something runs
1
1
The platform on which the test(s) were run
1
For earl:asserts(x,y), in general, the assertor (x)
asserts the assertion (y). EARL has specific
classes for these
Generally, for earl:email(x, y) x has an email address of y. This is not
a daml:UnambiguousProperty - use foaf:mbox for that purpose
A single guideline, checkpoint, etc.
This is a generic level of test criteria, for example,
the priorities/levels in WCAG. These shouldn't be a
string literal
The common proper name for some earl:Assertor
Operating System
e.g. the platform on which the test(s) were run, or the
general platform on which something runs
For earl:sameSubjectAs(x, y), x is defined as being the same
subject being evaluated (in an assertion) as y. In other
words, there is some property of sameness between the two -
the exact semantics of which are not defined here, but may
be useful to individual processors.
A suite of checkpoints, guidelines, or any other form of
rules that an earl:TestSubject can be evaluated against.
e.g. WCAG 1.0
Points to a particular example of a technology against which
one checked the particular subject (which in EARL would be
an earl:TestSubject)
Points to a suite of technologies against which one checked
the particular subject (which in EARL would be an
earl:TestSubject), e.g., the W3C's SVG Test Suite
For earl:version(x, y), read: x is of version y